Key Takeaways
The Japanese government has unveiled a long-term goal of lifting the combined share of stocks, investment trusts, and bonds within household financial assets to 40% by 2040. As an extension of the "asset management nation" strategy aimed at shifting more than 1,000 trillion yen in household cash and deposits into risk assets, it is expected to act as a structural variable for Japan's brokerage and asset management industry sectors, as well as for supply-demand (order flow) on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.
For Korean investors, it serves both as a gauge of potential fund flow into Japanese equities and as a comparative benchmark for how far Korea's value-up policy can progress, given that the country faces the same aging and low-growth structure.
What Happened
The Japanese government has set a target of raising the combined share of stocks, investment trusts, and bonds within household financial assets to around 40% by 2040. Japanese households have traditionally held more than half of their assets in cash and deposits, and the aim is to reshape that structure toward risk assets.
This dovetails with policy packages already underway, including the expansion of the new Nippon Individual Savings Account (NISA) tax-exemption program, stronger financial education, and improvements to corporate governance. Because the government has pinned down a concrete numerical target in the form of an asset share, this reads not as a one-off slogan but as a fund flow-steering policy spanning more than a decade.
Background and Context
Through Japan's prolonged deflationary period, a preference for cash became entrenched, but with recent inflation accompanied by wage increases, awareness has spread that deposits alone erode real value. For the government, as aging intensifies the strain on pension finances, there is a growing need to encourage households to build their own assets and prepare for retirement.
Korea, too, has made resolving the "Korea discount" and enhancing corporate value (value-up) a central agenda, so Japan's policy path offers a reference case for designing Korean policy.
Impact on Markets and Stocks
- Japanese brokerages (Nomura, Daiwa): A broader base of household investment expands the revenue foundation from brokerage and investment-product sales commissions as well as wealth management (WM) operations. Growth in trading accounts and assets under management (AUM) acts as direct earnings leverage.
- Asset managers and the investment-trust industry: Since expanding the investment-trust share is written into the target, fund flow into funds and ETFs translates into higher management fees. Long-term, regular-installment money carries low volatility and becomes a stable revenue source.
- Korean brokerage and financial stocks (Mirae Asset Securities, Samsung Securities, etc.): While not a direct beneficiary, if a Japanese-style asset-shift policy delivers results, it could add policy justification to Korea's value-up and pension-reform debates, stoking expectations of a medium- to long-term re-rating.
- The Tokyo market overall: A gradual inflow of household money works in the direction of improving supply-demand (order flow) stability in a Japanese market that relies heavily on foreign investors.
Investor Checkpoints
- Trends in new NISA account openings and contribution amounts — a leading indicator of whether the policy actually translates into fund flow.
- The rate of change in AUM and WM fee income in the quarterly earnings of Japanese brokerages and asset managers.
- The schedule for Korea's follow-up value-up measures and policy announcements related to pension asset allocation.
- The yen exchange rate and Japanese long-term interest rates — macro variables that determine households' incentive to move into risk assets.
Outlook
If the target stays on course, Japan's brokerage and asset management industry sectors could enjoy the benefits of structural fund flow over more than a decade, and there is room for the policy momentum to spill over indirectly to Korean financial stocks. That said, because this is a long-term goal set for 2040, there is a risk that execution could waver with changes in government or shifts in policy priorities, and it must also be considered that a deeper market correction could reinforce household aversion to risk assets once again, delaying achievement of the target.
This article is content automatically summarized and analyzed based on the original news report. View original (Yonhap News Securities)





